Sunday, 24 January 2016

Jeremy Clarkson mocks transgender people

A friend emailed me with a photo of Jeremy Clarkson's article in today's Sunday Times. This is it:

If you click on this, you can make out the text. It's Clarkson sounding off about various transgender items in the news. But he has gone too far. And this is something in print, not an offhand comment made in haste or when tired, that might be laughed off. It is crass.

Did he nevertheless think it would strike a common chord with The Broad Mass Of Sensible British People - Sunday Times readers to boot - to be read with a sage nod of the head, and treated as a fair review of what personally peeves him - and his readers - about the Transgender World? A review that might indeed be regarded by them as eye-rollingly humorous, if it were not all so very sad? Who can say. It's still a crass article.

I emailed my friend back in these terms.

That's outrageous, and I am surprised it was thought fit to publish. Clarkson's article must surely contravene every official standard to do with sensitive subjects that the press agreed to adhere to. So much for self-regulation.

Clarkson has been in 'provocative mode' for a long time. In so far as he scorns silliness in outmoded social attitudes, or the stupidities of officialdom, or is witty about (say) caravanners, I have smiled and let him have his say. I respect his thinking on what cars are worth driving, and indeed his driving skills. But his schoolboy banter and practical jokes are harder to digest, and I've often thought he pathologically wants to hurt and spoil, and is basically a man looking for a confrontation, with many of the characteristics of a bully. I thought at first the BBC had over-reacted when they fired him last year, but now I think they may have acted for the best. He had brought them into disrepute.

And this article is yet another sign that he has become a loose cannon. It's almost too bad to be true. He trots out nearly every cliché about trans people that papers have ever published. He doesn't actually call MTF persons rapists, but he implies that those in men's prisons have spotted a dodge worth exploiting. It doesn't 'balance' the piece to reveal he cynically pretended religious zeal in order to get more time with his girlfriend.

The cut at the parents of the eight year old is the unkindest. It's almost unbelievably cruel and heartless. I won't be forgiving him. That's it. He's said too much too clearly and too publicly. I'd hate to be associated with him now.

I dare say some neanderthal men will agree with him, but not all men will by any means, and certainly not men who care and can think for themselves. I'd like to think that some male champion of knowledge and fairness will slap him across the face and challenge him to a duel. A pity that would be against the law. I hope in any event that the women of the world will cry out against him and his very unfunny words, and force The Times and indeed Amazon to drop him like a hot potato.

To his face, if I bumped into him, I would tell Mr Clarkson that his article was stupid and offensive, and reveals that he is not up to speed on what 'being trans' is all about.

It's a shame that a trained journalist and media presenter with a brain, considerable influence, and a big following, can't get his head around the subject and start re-educating all those people who might listen to him.


  1. Just when you think the media has finally come to its senses they slip and show just what mindless scum they are. What an idiot, what will his family be thinking of him making them look like fools...

  2. There are so many things wrong with that article but the one thing that leaped out at me was at the end and brings to mind the phrase there are lies, damn lies and statistics. Less that 3 in 10 people are straight, honest, British people... Wait, how on Earth do you figure that one out. Oh, yes, come up with a load of random statistics and add them together and use what's left over as some completely unfounded fact.

    At least Clarkson is now off the BBC and on some channel where his audience is most likely to drop like a stone because its not as simple to watch as turning on the television.

  3. About three years ago I was part of a large crowd of transgender people who stood in a vigil outside the offices of the Daily Mail after Richard Littlejohn's Mail hatchet job drove Lucy Meadowes to suicide.

    The reaction to that Mail piece was something of a watershed. Before then it was open season on us, afterwards it became increasingly unacceptable.

    This piece and others like it are the rearguard actions of an anachronistic army in full retreat. In ten years time this is the kind of piece that will make Sunday Times journos squirm when it is brought up, and it will be one of the pieces cited when people write about how Clarkson used to be a big shot.

  4. You'd think a man like this would spot trends and adapt, if only for the sake of his career. But no. Sigh.



This blog is public, and I expect comments from many sources and points of view. They will be welcome if sincere, well-expressed and add something worthwhile to the post. If not, they face removal.

Ideally I want to hear from bloggers, who, like myself, are knowable as real people and can be contacted. Anyone whose identity is questionable or impossible to verify may have their comments removed. Commercially-inspired comments will certainly be deleted - I do not allow free advertising.

Whoever you are, if you wish to make a private comment, rather than a public one, then do consider emailing me - see my Blogger Profile for the address.

Lucy Melford