Sunday, 13 December 2015

Flickr milestone passed

I've done it - achieved one million viewings on the photo-hosting website Flickr. I was in Brighton last night, having a meal with friends at the China Garden restaurant, when, on a hunch, I got this up on my phone. This was the screenshot I recorded, to capture the transient moment:


The viewings total had been 300 short of a million a few hours before. Now another 1,500 people had taken a look.

Of course I'm pleased. Although it's taken nearly seven years to reach that magic million, the total was only 100,000 three years ago. Here's a shot taken on 16 November 2012, showing 100,004 viewings:


And even a year ago - thirteen months, to be more exact - the viewing total was only 500,000. Here's a shot taken on 10 October 2014, showing 512,019 viewings:


So I've garnered another 500,000 viewings over the last year or so.

Where does this get me? Well, nowhere in particular! It would have been nice if I'd had a penny for every viewing (a pound would have been even nicer!) but that didn't happen. I don't take it as evidence that I'm a Great Photographer. Most likely I've taken some 'different-from-the-usual' shots now and then, and people keep hitting on those. Or maybe it's simply that if you publish an awful lot of photos - and I've published 13,500 - you eventually become a big target for any searches made, and you get 'known'. Rather like having a lot of Premium Bonds makes a regular win much more likely.

Am I one of Flickr's 'most popular' stars? Surely not. But I may be well up the league table for the 'most prolific' of their account holders. So far as I know, Flickr doesn't make available any such tables, showing who has accumulated the most viewings, or has at least published the most shots. But supposing they did, it wouldn't be interesting unless I were somehow among the 'top 500' in the world in one or other category. It would, for instance, be a rather ho-hum accolade to be confirmed the 2,704,388th 'most popular', or the 693,702nd 'most prolific'!

I will say, however, that the viewings total does encourage me to go on publishing, and see how far I can push the total up to. One friend asked me whether I would now aim for 2,000,000 viewings. I said yes. But not as the main reason for taking photos. I do that for the sheer excitement of it, because gets me out to see places I might otherwise not bother with. You do need an incentive to go far out of your way - and the prospect of a few good shots definitely spurs you on to make that effort.

I think photography is a fabulous antidote to laziness and inertia.

6 comments:

  1. Congratulations on a great tally! I went to see what five years had done to the few I had uploaded but got frustrated with the interface and could not resist hitting the delete account button when it showed up... Mine were just old monochrome and your are much more colourful and fun to look at.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Coline! But I know that you do take some very well-composed and professional shots, all the same.

    Lucy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lucy, I do my best but prefer to do my almost one image per day photo blog which may exist for a while once I am gone. Imagine my surprise to see your bridge in the woods picture today, Yours is a much prettier bridge but I did a very similar photograph using a 4x5 inch Speed Graphic camera in 1977! Who needs exif data embedded? 135mm lens, 1 second at f32...

      Delete
  3. Well done, Lucy. Just think... one of my friends is a Flickr millionaire!

    I don't have a 'pro' Flickr account, so can't see my own statistics, but strongly suspect that, if you're a millionaire then I'm a Flickr pauper. Spare a hit of two for a poor woman, can you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is that why I went round in circles wondering how to get stats!? I hate a poor interface clearly not tested on real users. I once, briefly, considered something like flicker could be a way to preserve some of my images on the net after the body had ceased to function. Now I see that constant changes to sites and the change to perpetual subscription makes the idea of "once on the internet, there forever" something of a myth.

      Delete

This blog is public, and I expect comments from many sources and points of view. They will be welcome if sincere, well-expressed and add something worthwhile to the post. If not, they face removal.

Ideally I want to hear from bloggers, who, like myself, are knowable as real people and can be contacted. Anyone whose identity is questionable or impossible to verify may have their comments removed. Commercially-inspired comments will certainly be deleted - I do not allow free advertising.

Whoever you are, if you wish to make a private comment, rather than a public one, then do consider emailing me - see my Blogger Profile for the address.

Lucy Melford