Tuesday, 20 May 2014

Mobile phone dangers

In the news today: a fresh study of whether children's use of mobile phones can harm their brain development - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-27475515.

The general danger from mobile phones - microwave energy zapping through persons standing too close to phone masts, or chatty people unwisely spending hours with the device pressed to their ear - has been seriously debated without conclusion for a long time, certainly over ten years. The risk for adults is presently said to be small and nothing much to worry about. That sounds very much like the industry persuading the government that there is no problem, and the government finding it impossible to press the issue - abetted by a public that does not want to hear that their favourite gadget will frazzle their brains, and lead to dementia. Besides, a mobile phone is so much part of most people's daily life nowadays. To ban these very useful items would be like the government ordering all private car owners off the roads - a catastrophic decision to make, politically undoable without a mass citizen rebellion.

There are those, of course, who for one reason or another (and it may just be clear-sighted sanity) have never really joined the 'phone club'. But most of the population have joined, and with alacrity, all over the world. And, surely, a billion or two ordinary people can't be wrong about anything, can they? I mean, if most people believe something is right, and desirable, how can that be ignored? (I hope my irony is not too obvious)

Even so, it is absolutely proper to regard soft and delicate children's brains as a different kettle of fish compared to the hard and fossilised brains that many adults have. So this new study is definitely a Good Thing. I wonder what the researchers will find, when they start talking to the children?

'It's good to talk' but it does seem to me, from daily observation, that voice calling (with the phone clamped to the ear, and dangerously close to the grey matter) has been in decline for some time.

It's still very popular, of course, with those of the older generation who grew up with the traditional fixed or cordless telephone in the house. But modern phone design favours interaction using the screen, with the device held well away from the head. Which for kids is a better scenario: aching thumbs and tired eyes are not good, but surely better than brain damage.

Voice calling has certainly been in decline among adults in my circle. It's regarded as something you resort to, if you need an immediate answer on some issue. Done on the understanding that the caller is disregarding the other person's right to peace and quiet, their possible inability to deal with a disembodied voice twittering from a small gadget, and without allowing the thinking-time needed for a worthwhile response.

Voice calling is utilitarian and not cool. It's for business people and grannies. In my circle we expect to be contacted by text or email; or if on Facebook, by a message there. And not normally by a voice call. Contact has polarised into carefully-composed electronic messages on one hand, to be replied to when genuinely convenient; and face-to-face conversation on the other, regarded as authentic and spontaneous and truly meaningful - the big payback for the effort of meeting up: the Real Deal. Neither poles fry the old cerebellum.

I'm not saying there is no problem, though. There has been an astonishing increase in background microwave traffic since the 1950s, to feed such things as radio, TV, radar, GPS, kitchen ovens, and of course mobile phones. Plus noise pollution from sundry low-frequency sources - traffic rumble, high-altitude aircraft, politicians' statements. Sometimes I wonder whether my 'tinnitus' is actually my hearing some of this stuff. Probably nonsense. But who is going to reassure me?


  1. I was cheered up today to be called "Honey" but now you are calling me "Grannie"!

    Soon humans will find themselves unable to raise their heads and one arm will hang limp whilst the other will be unable to be lowered and will certainly not straighten at the elbow...

    I am not subjected to much of this modern background microwaving unless you count that call I made briefly a few weeks ago, but still have tinnitus which ironically I don't notice when I occasionally visit a noisy city.

  2. You really are pushing the idea that voice calls have been relegated to the lower draw but I wonder just where you get that idea Lucy. When out and about I see many people with the phone to their ear, probably just as many who are texting, listening to music or playing games. I wonder too why you say that children's brains are more susceptible to microwave energy. Microwave energy just as much as any other energy is not selectively damaging but I do see the point you are making as regards to the length of time of exposure. For us 'ancient fossils' perhaps the danger is only lessened because we won't have been exposed all our lives to microwave radiation. We certainly are being exposed to all kinds of background radiation that is true and who is to say that the rise in dementia among older folk isn't a result of such radiation? For many years we older folk have sat in front of our cathode-ray televisions which were considered to be quite hazardous to our health. Our modern laptop computers use high frequency digital radio waves to communicate with the Internet through our routers and they sit on our knees don't they? The main perceived danger with the mobile phone is when the phone itself sends out a signal rather than the signals it receives which are comparatively lower in strength. I'm of the opinion that any radiation no matter the source isn't good for us and no matter our age. Perhaps we should stay connected through wires and ditch this mobile stuff. We have become too reliant on technology for our good and it can only get worse as far as I can see.

    Shirley Anne x


This blog is public, and I expect comments from many sources and points of view. They will be welcome if sincere, well-expressed and add something worthwhile to the post. If not, they face removal.

Ideally I want to hear from bloggers, who, like myself, are knowable as real people and can be contacted. Anyone whose identity is questionable or impossible to verify may have their comments removed. Commercially-inspired comments will certainly be deleted - I do not allow free advertising.

Whoever you are, if you wish to make a private comment, rather than a public one, then do consider emailing me - see my Blogger Profile for the address.

Lucy Melford